Energy from a Quantum vacume

First posting: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 2:16:18 PM

Kerry N.

I was trying to think of a way to produce propetual motion, but to do this, you need propetual energy. I was thinking that maby you could get the energy from virtual particals and virtual antiparticals by extracting their charge. The Reason for this is because I am trying to creat an electrical engine to creat a particle/energy wave in space for more efficient transportation. This Particle/energy wave will lift a ship and cary it to a desired location. If you think you can come up with some ideas/theories, please post them! Thank you Freshman in highschool, Kerry N.

RESPONSES

rafravenscroft@hotmail.com | (62.252.32.6) | Tuesday, 19 February 2002 6:08:14 PM
cool

metalbeing | (198.189.158.81) | Tuesday, 9 April 2002 1:24:20 AM
Forget virtual particles. They're in and out of existence so quickly their energy is nill. That's why they're called "virtual" particles.

| (24.27.34.25) | Tuesday, 7 May 2002 11:42:07 AM
try magnets as a propetual energy duh!!!! oh ya im 12

Scott Clark | (199.197.135.1) | Wednesday, 3 July 2002 4:37:38 PM
Hi, Telsa had an interesting concept on extraction of energy in a vacume based on ionic charges and stressor energy in the vacume, another fellow, berdini actually came up with a method of extraction using a timing circuit to create a pulse to the electrolite in a battery that a mechanisim that would put out power for charging from a flywheel based dc motor based system(Caution)If the pulse was to much of a spike it will explode the battery due to hydrogen release from the battery, other systems include Searl Device (magnetic rotational mechanism) very interesting though a Russian group did a variation of that device not using Electromagneticly imprinted rollers such as Prof Searls device, these devices not only produce tapable energy they exibited weight reduction, I am a researcher in the finger lakes region persuing another form of this type of technology but working towards a different kind of device I observed in the mid 70's on a program that was not a mechanical device as such as the above mentioned but based on similar principals using a Quartz Crystal with Geometric configuration but the formation process is more complex. The device I observed was an artifact recovered from a pyramid about 200mi south of flordia by a scuba diver. Thats all for now gota go.

Scott Clark | (199.197.135.1) | Wednesday, 3 July 2002 4:45:52 PM
Bedini was the correct spelling, Oops Not Berdini

Christopher | (209.210.159.29) | Sunday, 18 August 2002 1:10:59 AM
If you e-mail Fueless@aol.com and request information on this product I think that you will be amazed. You can purchase a video for 5 dollars. Although the video is low quality. The information is accurate and revolutionizing. The inventor uses a "Double header" system in his electric engine. There are a few different engines shown on the video, all very impressive. The inventor has removed the pistons, exhaust, and all emissions from a Chevy 350 and installed electro-magnetic coils along with the origional distributor and a few circuts that "recycle electricity" and for the problem with explosions as someone stated earlier, a non-arching system is a must. The inventor has also built from scratch engines and converted volkswagon engines (the easiest @ about seven thousand dollars) and model airplane engines that have incredible horsepower. The inventor raises the possibility of this technology combined with anti-gravity devises could be this new mode of transportation that power inter galactic space travel? hmmmm.. first he will get the chevy 350 converted engine to power a truck and drive it accrost the U.S. without charging the batteries. Of course there is no gasoline or any combustible fuel. There is synthetic oil in the crankcase but the inventor also states that this may not need to be changed but every million miles or so. Get the video... it's cheap.. it'll amaze you and your friends and possibly help you in your scientific endeavours. Xrider

Edwin | (213.122.90.84) | Saturday, 24 August 2002 8:45:49 AM
I do not have the answer to your question However Look on the bright side; If you have the question, you'r half way there to the answer! Thats a whole 50% Most people don't have the intelect to think, letalone ask?

Edwin | (213.122.90.84) | Saturday, 24 August 2002 8:47:14 AM
I do not have the answer to your question However Look on the bright side; If you have the question, you'r half way there to the answer! Thats a whole 50% Most people don't have the intelect to think, letalone ask?

tony | (4.18.252.6) | Wednesday, 11 September 2002 10:12:33 AM
magnets are an exellent form of propetual motion and energy, they never run out of power. Im 14 but that doesnt matter

tony | (4.18.252.6) | Wednesday, 11 September 2002 10:12:51 AM
magnets are an exellent form of propetual motion and energy, they never run out of power. Im 14 but that doesnt matter

true genius | (64.90.240.3) | Thursday, 19 September 2002 3:11:08 AM
IT'S NOT MAGANETS,IONIC PARTICLE, VIRTUAL PARTICLES, OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT IT IS SO MUCH EASIER THAN ALL THAT. IT'S BASIC PHYSICS AND THE LAWS OF GRAVITY. IF PEOPLE WOULD JUST GET THERE HEAD OUT OF THERE SUPER HIGH TECHNOLOGY ASS THIS COULD HAVE CREATED ALREADY. YOU HAVE TO CHANGE THE PARADIGUM

true genius | (64.90.240.3) | Thursday, 19 September 2002 3:12:42 AM
IT'S NOT MAGANETS,IONIC PARTICLE, VIRTUAL PARTICLES, OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT IT IS SO MUCH EASIER THAN ALL THAT. IT'S BASIC PHYSICS AND THE LAWS OF GRAVITY. IF PEOPLE WOULD JUST GET THERE HEAD OUT OF THERE SUPER HIGH TECHNOLOGY ASS THIS COULD HAVE CREATED ALREADY. YOU HAVE TO CHANGE THE PARADIGUM

Eric | (12.38.96.2) | Friday, 20 September 2002 11:20:39 PM
I have invetigating and researching this subject for a while, my fether and have been trying to build the ultimate energy source through the propetual motion. it does work we know this. and the answer is already in front of you and all around you, positve and negitive energy it is what the world truely is based around, and that is the answers, positive and negitive charges. Maganets. good luck eric age 20 i would love to hear how thing are going for you and maybe exchange ideas. beaudoine@gmc.edu

Eric | (12.38.96.2) | Friday, 20 September 2002 11:21:45 PM
I have invetigating and researching this subject for a while, my fether and have been trying to build the ultimate energy source through the propetual motion. it does work we know this. and the answer is already in front of you and all around you, positve and negitive energy it is what the world truely is based around, and that is the answers, positive and negitive charges. Maganets. good luck eric age 20 i would love to hear how thing are going for you and maybe exchange ideas. beaudoine@gmc.edu

Eric | (12.38.96.2) | Friday, 20 September 2002 11:22:51 PM
I have invetigating and researching this subject for a while, my fether and have been trying to build the ultimate energy source through the propetual motion. it does work we know this. and the answer is already in front of you and all around you, positve and negitive energy it is what the world truely is based around, and that is the answers, positive and negitive charges. Maganets. good luck eric age 20 i would love to hear how thing are going for you and maybe exchange ideas. beaudoine@gmc.edu

Timothy | (152.163.188.37) | Thursday, 3 October 2002 5:14:23 AM
I have invented a propetual motion device that works ,Shhhhh !, but i need someone to help me get it to where i could get a patend , this is no joke !It has been running for 10 weeks straight.True genius doesnt know what he is taking about , mine IS made with magnets. I will give you more info as soon as I see YOUR RESPONSE on this page ! Thanks , that is all , but remember , Shhhh , please do not speak of this any where else , please........

TATS | (168.172.26.121) | Friday, 4 October 2002 10:23:15 PM
Timothy, that sounds good, have you bridged the barriers that kept humanity in suspension for so long? tats@webmail.co.za

JLW | (162.58.0.224) | Thursday, 10 October 2002 1:43:03 AM
Timothy, go to the Library of Congress website to get information about obtaining a patent. You will also find a great deal of information on devices of all types already patented. GOOD LUCK to you!

Yellek Nayrb Divad | (168.9.214.20) | Tuesday, 15 October 2002 5:14:34 AM
Would you please give me a real woking propetual motion divice out line.

Heh | (12.241.211.82) | Thursday, 31 October 2002 9:07:49 PM
I laugh at it all. Propetual Motion. A concept to man because man wants not things to improve life but things they can charge for and know.

Andrew | (206.216.151.117) | Thursday, 14 November 2002 11:07:51 AM
It seems it all starts with an idea. Magnets are great but first understanding motor theory. Foward you can acheive a motor reverse you get a generator thus thinking forth dementialy. The problem you run into is weight. It is out there but use what you got.

jest3r | (217.39.210.20) | Monday, 18 November 2002 10:32:37 AM
both tom bearden and john bedini have covered this topic exstensively and if you study particle physics you'll find that the answers you are looking for have been available for the last 50 years or so. check out http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/Final%20Secret%209%20Feb%201993/index.html for more info.

Jason A NIchols | (67.227.222.68) | Wednesday, 27 November 2002 2:36:09 PM
I understand propetual motion by first understanding propetual power. All my research indicates it's possibility but from obveuse goverment involvement only. I'm saying it's factual but only if you understand that you would not be allowed to use it for reasons that will effect the economy. A hint perhaps e-mail me privatly at nicholes51@msn.com with return private e-mail address

Jason A NIchols | (67.227.222.68) | Wednesday, 27 November 2002 2:41:57 PM
There is one substance that is on this earth that has a higher energy than nuclear and is safe.I't could move 600 million tons with no effort and do it again over and over it avoiding static that is you true problem Kelly.

TS | (152.163.188.37) | Tuesday, 10 December 2002 10:48:09 AM
I too am attempting to find a way to produce perpetual motion, though my theory is some what different. I believe that the key to perpetual motion is gravity. Gravity is what makes it impossible and I believe that ggrabity is what will make it possible. I have incomplete designs for a machine that uses gravity to stay in a constant state of motion. It is not yet ready, but I believ I will solve the remaining problems soon.

sean byrne | (24.247.190.249) | Wednesday, 11 December 2002 11:57:47 AM
If you defy the laws of thermodynamics the karma police will come for you!!!

GLEN COOPER | (205.188.209.10) | Sunday, 22 December 2002 12:37:31 PM
I AM INTERESTED IN THIS SUBJECT, BUT HAVE DONE LITTLE TO EXPLORE. I HAVE SOME IDEAS, AND WILL CONTINUE TO READ THIS PAGE. E-MAIL GLENRAY7@AOL.COM

peter | (24.191.125.83) | Saturday, 4 January 2003 9:11:18 AM
Kerry N. I was trying to think of a way to produce propetual motion, but to do this, you need propetual energy.

peter | (24.191.125.83) | Saturday, 4 January 2003 9:11:23 AM
Kerry N. I was trying to think of a way to produce propetual motion, but to do this, you need propetual energy.

peter | (24.191.125.83) | Saturday, 4 January 2003 9:12:42 AM
Exactly. n (smile)

peter | (24.191.125.83) | Saturday, 4 January 2003 9:16:08 AM
TS | (152.163.188.37) | Tuesday, 10 December 2002 10:48:09 AM I too am attempting to find a way to produce perpetual motion, though my theory is some what different. I believe that the key to perpetual motion is gravity. but of course, what else is free?

peter | (24.191.125.83) | Saturday, 4 January 2003 9:28:53 AM
when stated, it will be a something simple. it will be soft, simple and somewhat obvious. if fact, it's happening now; we just can't see or understand it. see it if we care; understand it if we are looking. i like you have been doing both for a while, now. i am still trying to decipher what i drew on the wall, but i do think i have it. not to say i can had it to you in a box -- just yet. but simple posts make for simple answers and you folks are real real close. There is a symbol that is on my wall -- over and over -- and I "think" i know what it stands for, but i a not sure. | U what does that mean? i don't have a clue in the world, but it has to do with something

peter | (24.191.125.83) | Saturday, 4 January 2003 9:36:58 AM
in fact the symbol is like this: a U shape with a pipe suspended above the U shaped figure. (not in it, not beside it...above it. one line; suspended above the u shaped cruve. what dose that stand for? (smile) Peter

peter | (24.191.125.83) | Saturday, 4 January 2003 9:40:14 AM
| (24.27.34.25) | Tuesday, 7 May 2002 11:42:07 AM try magnets as a propetual energy duh!!!! oh ya im 12 but i am 13. How do magnets work?

peter | (24.191.125.83) | Saturday, 4 January 2003 9:43:22 AM
and besides; which magnet are you talking about? Think about it.... (smile)

peter | (24.191.125.83) | Saturday, 4 January 2003 9:52:45 AM
143 then it will not work 43

peter | (24.191.125.83) | Saturday, 4 January 2003 9:59:42 AM
PM already is in action. If it hits some wall eons from now, so be it. It is happening right now. Go find it! (smile) But where, my master? Where is will do the most good, of course. (smile) PM is the only thing keeping us alive. (smile) Right now.

peter | (24.191.125.83) | Saturday, 4 January 2003 10:19:49 AM
Say you are laying on the ground and have to pick which two objects will kill you when they strike you head having nothing else but beinging dropped from the same hight? The little one, of course! law and intent; law and intent. mass has no intent. mass just is governed by law. so which is it? the big one of the little one? if law or judge's sit on the same rule we can not undersand, it all falls to base. If there is not a "PURE" law out there, we fall to base. Now, that can become kind of sceary say base is a bit too pushy? for the time that neither understood? It, my friends, is what the classic's said -- without knowing -- for some hundereds of years. once you bound me to the wall, write my why. That me friend is PM./

David | (172.132.159.242) | Sunday, 5 January 2003 10:33:02 AM
Timothy.The goverment will not allow a patend for propectual motion, they say it doesnt exist for it would no dought destroy our acconomy but I know it exist and have developed a working model, One that can be easily dissasebled, a very simple idea really.P.S. be very carefull.

Elijah N. collins Jr. Scientist | (216.96.92.110) | Thursday, 9 January 2003 7:25:54 AM
I have been involved in research involving a perpetual generater In theory Magnets are the way to go. I've worked with electricity and electronics for 12 years of my life now. My theory is that is you could get a set of magnets to run in a circle inside a coil by changing polarity of coil you can generate electricity by adding a second coil on the outside of the circle which the magnets hit and create electricity. Meanwhile a step up transformer pickes up the energy and feeds it back into the first coil thus causing a hall effect and propetual motion. Elijah N. Collins JR.Nationa; aeronatic & space Admin. training

Elijah N. collins Jr. Scientist | (216.96.92.110) | Thursday, 9 January 2003 7:36:11 AM
You are working with perpetual motion I hope you realize that in revealation the your idea you would be fighting a strong enemy infact several factors. I'll explain. 1. FRICTION Friction will stop and thing just about, it creates heat and heat will destroy magnets, coils, bearings, and lubes. 2. GRAVITY The thrust must be MORE that the force of gravity if not the equal forces in opposite directions will cause it to hover. 3. atmospheric fields you have to create a kind of orbit in which to come down in If not you will burn up upon entry of the earths atmosphere You might want to keep it in mind!

lehmer 1 | (216.96.92.110) | Thursday, 9 January 2003 7:43:30 AM
wouldn't it be great if we could use propetual motion it things earthen such as cars trucks Etc. give it a thought or two. Oh Explain what a quantum vaccume is and how it works please. i know i try too hard.

hot_rod_maniac@yahoo.com | (216.96.92.110) | Thursday, 9 January 2003 7:47:36 AM
I want to hear from some people on this subject it sounds interesting in my perspective. I check my mail every 1 weeks and try to respond to everyone. LEHMER 1

hot_rod_maniac@yahoo.com | (216.96.92.110) | Thursday, 9 January 2003 7:47:56 AM
I want to hear from some people on this subject it sounds interesting in my perspective. I check my mail every 1 weeks and try to respond to everyone. LEHMER 1

hot_rod_maniac@yahoo.com | (216.96.92.110) | Thursday, 9 January 2003 7:48:11 AM
I want to hear from some people on this subject it sounds interesting in my perspective. I check my mail every 1 weeks and try to respond to everyone. LEHMER 1

lehmer 1 | (216.96.92.110) | Thursday, 9 January 2003 7:52:19 AM
Salt water batteries are almost constant especially when you live near an ocean :-)

JOSHH | (64.172.131.230) | Thursday, 9 January 2003 8:35:11 AM
Theories of popetual mothio are great the problem is now-take for instance somebody created a popetual motion car that requires no maintenance-just emagine how many jobs will be lost and peoples financial lives destroyed-you need money for food-bills-etc. now if someone made a machine that produced fruit and vegatibles sure there would be alot of pissed off farmers but you would cure world hunger and with a popetual motion or other type of machine that produces electricity to run the machine and other things like lights and a heater and a water producing mahine-well you would have almost everything people would need to survive without a job-but anyhow i think gravity is the key to popetual motion its constant and everywhere

Tim13 | (139.134.63.153) | Tuesday, 28 January 2003 4:24:42 AM
Tesla had a car using an AC motor that ran from a 'gravitational energy converter' in the 1930's that could do about 90 miles per hour. See bottom of page: www.lumininet.net/~wenonah/new/tesla.htm#TeslaAuto

Brian | (64.68.247.77) | Saturday, 1 February 2003 11:10:00 AM
God solved it first, it's called a universe, use the theory behind what works. Elijah your right when you say your equipment will wear out, you have the best definition, Joshh would the world be cleaner? would the farmers use the new devices to plant and harvest? cutting fuel cost, cutting cost for food? wouldn't this lower heating cost? thus how much money do you really need? Joshh your concerns are valid and should be considered. If it is harnessed will someone market it so the poor can afford it? I will await your reply. Thanks!

Brian | (64.68.247.77) | Saturday, 1 February 2003 11:10:05 AM
God solved it first, it's called a universe, use the theory behind what works. Elijah your right when you say your equipment will wear out, you have the best definition, Joshh would the world be cleaner? would the farmers use the new devices to plant and harvest? cutting fuel cost, cutting cost for food? wouldn't this lower heating cost? thus how much money do you really need? Joshh your concerns are valid and should be considered. If it is harnessed will someone market it so the poor can afford it? I will await your reply. Thanks!

michael | (67.40.77.161) | Wednesday, 12 February 2003 4:57:03 AM
I think you all are very smart but.I think I have a better idea if antiparticals hit psitive energy it releses kenetic energy so if you can make antiparticals and foucus the kenetic energy then you can have pure momentum.

michael | (67.40.77.161) | Wednesday, 12 February 2003 5:56:56 AM
it's me my formula makes infinet energy for the positive particals can be trash so then you can also solve pullotion and I'm only ten years old I think you might want to know why I don't patent my Idea.

Diego | (152.163.207.47) | Thursday, 13 February 2003 9:29:07 AM
I think that you should blah blah blah, then when the machine begins to rotate you blah blah blah blah blah. Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah, blah blah blah blah blah blah blah, and finally blah blah blah blah blah. Its rather simple but it uses the priciples of gravity, blah blah, and magnetism. This is only my rough draft of ideas, but i will have the definite answear soon.

Diego | (150.176.227.130) | Friday, 14 February 2003 3:31:06 AM
by the way your time is kinda set wrong i dint write my last message at 9:29:07 in the morning

anonymous | (152.163.188.37) | Friday, 14 February 2003 8:21:50 AM
so lauren how are you doing today

Im sorry to say | (24.170.18.122) | Friday, 14 February 2003 12:44:05 PM
Propetual motion is impossible. listen to Newton. You can only use what evergy you put into the device and nothing more.

Im sorry to say | (24.170.18.122) | Friday, 14 February 2003 12:56:25 PM
I hope one day ill have to eat thous words.

Alan Cresswell | (195.92.168.165) | Friday, 14 February 2003 7:14:51 PM
You will find 5 Quantum engines at www.thewebspert.com/cresswell/

Diego | (205.188.209.10) | Tuesday, 18 February 2003 3:36:30 PM
for all you geniuses out there, the key word is PERPETUAL motion, not propetual.

K | (216.148.246.134) | Wednesday, 5 March 2003 10:43:27 AM
perpetual motion may not be possible, but using energy that is already there is. such as solar, wind, gravitational, ect. so no one has put out a good new idea for harnissing these natural power sources (or if they did the public doesnt know about it) doesnt mean they cant exist. Theories are what science is based on. even gravity is only a theory

nathan | (216.77.209.127) | Friday, 11 April 2003 1:47:05 AM
I think you might find a book by an auther by the last name of "kaurss"....entitled "Atom" I will let you know when i finish reading it...

nathan | (216.77.209.127) | Friday, 11 April 2003 1:47:35 AM
I think you might find a book by an auther by the last name of "kaurss"....entitled "Atom" I will let you know when i finish reading it...

robert | (64.91.5.33) | Tuesday, 6 May 2003 5:58:36 AM
Water is heavier than air. Water vapor islighter than water...

robert | (64.91.5.33) | Tuesday, 6 May 2003 5:58:50 AM
Water is heavier than air. Water vapor islighter than water...

robert | (64.91.5.33) | Tuesday, 6 May 2003 5:59:16 AM
Water is heavier than air. Water vapor islighter than water...

Derek | (202.129.95.21) | Friday, 9 May 2003 2:15:58 AM
Maybe take advantage of solar winds. Tap into the existing universal perpetual cycle.

sara | (203.36.248.18) | Tuesday, 20 May 2003 2:37:12 PM
it uses the the principle of gravity and magnetism. i have a question for you do you know who invented the vacume? what date and what gave him/her the idea?

Derek | (129.78.104.187) | Wednesday, 28 May 2003 12:47:07 PM
Vacuum was invented by someone who was full of hot air, actually he sucked. the real story is he sucked on a sofa and proved that he could get dust in his mouth or sothing.

DawsPl@aol.com | (195.93.32.10) | Thursday, 29 May 2003 9:48:06 AM
hi i think the way to go is with looped coil magnets out of 18 inch round speaker magnets with wire rapped round in a series of 4 with internal magnets spinning at 400rpm giving 300 amps timing has to be perfect to switch over to the sine wave generater, mine has been running for 7 month without stopping and still producing power,i have been trying to prove all the Boffins Wrong for 15 years. Has any body got the plans to build a 1000watt square wave inverter DCtoAC IF SO CONTACT ME at the ABOVE if i can help any one feel free to get in touch.Thank you for letting me have my say Paul.

Tom Younk | (210.10.150.211) | Friday, 30 May 2003 12:53:54 AM
Spelling and punctuation will help you all communicate more clearly!

Smith | (62.254.64.5) | Saturday, 31 May 2003 2:17:34 AM
It is possible, but the government won't allow it. Start an electric motor with a normal power source, link this through a gearbox via a chain and link again to a very large generator. Feed the generator to the first motor and disconnect the main source. The unit still runs. I have had this system running now for just over two years. It does need servicing, but it works.

Captain Will | (209.240.198.60) | Sunday, 1 June 2003 11:46:36 PM
Alright, so many good ideas... and yet the thing you seek is... frictionless, it's self levitating, is not effected by resistance, and uses a balancing or centering mechanism (friction free) to control outside forces upon it, the slightest motion or vibration will set it motion and thus unless the universe stops entirely, it will eventually get up to speed, thus there is no "down kick", and no heat. It is gyro perfect so that it will operate in any position, temperature controlled to sustain simple super conductivity, and produces more enregy when moving than is stored at rest, hmmm... let me see, radio shack it due for a visit if your thinking about what it is. Just do yourself one favor, be sure you build ten thousand of the little buggers and send them to every store in America as a "nick nac" office supply gadget! Because unless tens of thousands of people see it, the oil companies will bury it. The military will fight over it, and you're life will be under a microsope until your dying day. Just becareful to keep it for your own use, and watchout for overspeed. Good luck... and no, the world is not flat anymore, it used to be, but not anymore.

robert | (64.91.5.33) | Tuesday, 10 June 2003 7:43:52 AM
The human heart is propetual for a little while. As long as we live to have to use it. Electric and magnetics...

robert | (64.91.5.33) | Tuesday, 10 June 2003 7:44:08 AM
The human heart is propetual for a little while. As long as we live to have to use it. Electric and magnetics...

robert | (64.91.5.33) | Tuesday, 10 June 2003 7:44:23 AM
The human heart is propetual for a little while. As long as we live to have to use it. Electric and magnetics...

Dan Sapienza | (162.42.80.210) | Sunday, 15 June 2003 11:29:09 AM
We have a working prototype of a gasoline engine that has been converted into a electro-magnetic engine. This revolutionary approach to engine application uses the principles of linear acceleration, eliminates combustion in the engine, no external fuel is used. The simple design has a closed system, no intake manifold, the cylinder head and the exhaust system has been eliminated. A microprocessor controls a switching device, which controls electric current that develops magna-motion force. Because of personal reasons we can no longer develop the next step of a automobile gasoline engine and convert it into an electro-magnetic engine. If interested and with financial means to bring this project to full term, Please contact me...holisticcook@kachine.net

Austin Lowrey | (68.114.217.82) | Thursday, 19 June 2003 8:54:42 AM
I don't know if were includeing outer atompere as a venue for propetual motion but it you were to drill a hole throuh the moon all the way straight trough the middle and sent a sherical object though it the gravity of the moon would pull it at an invreseing rate twords the center but once it passed the center it would have a reverse effect and pull it back would this not continue forever? Please send comments to achussla@yahoo.com

robert | (64.91.5.33) | Tuesday, 24 June 2003 9:06:44 AM
It would be easier just to wrap a bunch of wire around the earth and have propetual electricity. Do that to mars and you would have ways of making water and air , travel . Atleast you would get something out of it...

goldschmidt | (195.244.160.66) | Thursday, 3 July 2003 7:10:14 PM
j'ai fabriqué une pile magnetique basée sur la presence de 2 aimants de force differente.le flux magnétique passe via un tube qui rend le flux concentrique et linéaire,et qui donne 4 volt continu. Une batterie de 12 volt a donc 3 éléments.

goldschmidt, 3 rue due heysel, bruxelles | (195.244.160.66) | Thursday, 3 July 2003 7:13:04 PM
mon adresse complète

claude rass | (203.29.131.24) | Tuesday, 15 July 2003 2:57:02 PM
how do you control the power of a wind generator when you canot control the soeed

bmagfox | (170.215.46.249) | Saturday, 26 July 2003 9:06:56 AM
What do you all think of the fuelless engine, and heater, they seem a likely possibility to create free power and a perpetual motion machine.

ben smith | (149.161.224.28) | Tuesday, 29 July 2003 2:39:19 AM
i didn't read all of this but, i know your all wrong. if you want to devise a method for creating propetual motion, there are two things you need a creative mind and einsteins theory of realativity... i've been working on the problem since i was 14. i'm sorry, i didn't say anything about tesla or maxwell, you think about that...... P.S. i'm very close!

ben smith | (149.161.224.28) | Tuesday, 29 July 2003 2:51:16 AM
the way it will happen is to use simple mechanics and magnets. the flow of energy wont actually be propetual, nor would you want it to be because then you couldn't control it but, it will be as close as humans ever need it to be.

ben smith | (149.161.224.43) | Tuesday, 29 July 2003 3:18:17 AM
think of a quasar (a body of mass so much greater then anything we could dream of comprehending)as it pushes matter out of both sides, the energy in it is not propetual, and we think we can create something with more energy. we don't need propetual motion but, i do wish it possible and safe.

ben smith | (149.161.224.43) | Tuesday, 29 July 2003 3:18:40 AM
think of a quasar (a body of mass so much greater then anything we could dream of comprehending)as it pushes matter out of both sides, the energy in it is not propetual, and we think we can create something with more energy. we don't need propetual motion but, i do wish it possible and safe.

ben smith | (149.161.224.43) | Tuesday, 29 July 2003 3:19:02 AM
think of a quasar (a body of mass so much greater then anything we could dream of comprehending)as it pushes matter out of both sides, the energy in it is not propetual, and we think we can create something with more energy. we don't need propetual motion but, i do wish it possible and safe.

ben smith | (149.161.224.43) | Tuesday, 29 July 2003 3:20:27 AM
think of a quasar (a body of mass so much greater then anything we could dream of comprehending)as it pushes matter out of both sides, the energy in it is not propetual, and we think we can create something with more energy. we don't need propetual motion but, i do wish it possible and safe.

ben smith | (149.161.224.41) | Wednesday, 30 July 2003 3:08:09 AM
sorry this wasn't on purpose!

Christopher Robbin | (208.178.23.25) | Wednesday, 20 August 2003 10:21:17 AM
correct me if im wrong ,and my spelling, but is elastic colition a propetual motion? its when two atoms bounce off eachother and have equal motion...or something.

Christopher Robbin | (208.178.23.25) | Wednesday, 20 August 2003 10:22:49 AM
correct me if im wrong ,and my spelling, but is elastic colition a propetual motion? its when two atoms bounce off eachother and have equal motion...or something.

Aaron Wallace | (63.183.137.145) | Tuesday, 2 September 2003 2:33:26 PM
People, perpetual motion is a device that is able to run without using an outside energy source. if you try to use anything that may relate to the rotation of the earth, you may, in time, slow the earths rotation down causing the earth to get closer to the sun. People must be careful when they try to build what they think might be a perpetual motion device. Momentum is energy, the earth is rotating around the sun because it has just enough momentum to keep from being pulled into the sun but not enough to be flung away from the sun. (so we think) if you were to use any magnetic rays given off by the sun to get energy, you will mostlikely be slowing the earthes rotation around the sun. You may not be slowing it down a lot but over time, it may become enough to cause harm. Any, just keep in mind that if you are trying to build a perpetual motion device, it has to rely on itself for energy. by the way, Smith(62.254.64.5) you are so full of it, the amount of energy produced by your generator is nowhere near the amount of energy your electric motor needs to over come the drag that your generator produces on the motor because of the load your generator puts on your motor. Then you still have to consider the extra amount of drag your chain and gears will produce. That is just to many converions and each conversion consumes energy. So I say again, Smith you are full of it, you don't have what you say you have.

Aaron Wallace | (63.183.137.145) | Tuesday, 2 September 2003 2:49:09 PM
I have thought of a device that uses gravity, water and pumps. The only problem is that I don't have the stuff I need to build it and test it. I have tried and tried to think of something that would cause it not to work but I haven't come up with anything and neight has anyone else I have told my idea to. I'm not a scientist or anything, I can't even spell, but I do know a lot about energy conversions, electronics, motion and energy. If you have any questions you would like to ask me post them and I will do my best to anwser them.(no promises) I will start to check this site often.

Robert Perry | (67.35.39.96) | Sunday, 9 November 2003 9:27:06 AM
Its over. I got it and you will be hearing about it soon. the world is about to change. oh and the is real playa.

Robert Perry | (67.35.39.96) | Sunday, 9 November 2003 9:27:41 AM
Its over. I got it and you will be hearing about it soon. the world is about to change. Oh. and the is real, playa.

BUBBA | (205.213.111.50) | Saturday, 22 November 2003 7:16:56 AM
HOW DOES A VACUMEWORK

BUBBA | (205.213.111.50) | Saturday, 22 November 2003 7:17:05 AM
HOW DOES A VACUMEWORK

BUBBA | (205.213.111.50) | Saturday, 22 November 2003 7:17:10 AM
HOW DOES A VACUMEWORK

BUBBA | (205.213.111.50) | Saturday, 22 November 2003 7:17:14 AM
HOW DOES A VACUMEWORK

BUBBA | (205.213.111.50) | Saturday, 22 November 2003 7:17:19 AM
HOW DOES A VACUMEWORK

BUBBA | (205.213.111.50) | Saturday, 22 November 2003 7:17:24 AM
HOW DOES A VACUMEWORK

BUBBA | (205.213.111.50) | Saturday, 22 November 2003 7:17:30 AM
HOW DOES A VACUMEWORK

kevin | (24.24.204.53) | Thursday, 1 January 2004 12:39:42 PM
hello

kevin | (24.24.204.53) | Thursday, 1 January 2004 12:40:38 PM
Happy New Year!

EINSTEIN2004 | (208.11.149.174) | Friday, 23 January 2004 3:56:22 AM
TRY THIS, ( GET A FAN MOTOR, AN ALTENATOR, HARMOLIC BALANCER, A REGULATED POWER SUPPLY, RUN IT ALL INTO A CONSTANT SINGLE SYSTEM,) BUT FIRST YOU HAVE TO GET THE FAN MOTOR STARTED WITH A 110 OUTLET, BUT AFTER YOU GET IT STARTED YOU CAN UNPLUG. THIS SYSTEM SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY START RUNNING ITSELF CONTINUASLY. SHOULD BE ENOUGH POWER TO RUN A 60 WATT LIGHT BULB AND ITSELF.

Alan Cresswell | (195.92.168.166) | Thursday, 5 February 2004 8:22:28 AM
Suggest you go to http://www.thewebspert.com/cresswell/. You will find many perpetual motion engines and why they are. Easiest is the water turbine.

Alan Cresswell | (195.92.168.166) | Thursday, 5 February 2004 8:22:32 AM
Suggest you go to http://www.thewebspert.com/cresswell/. You will find many perpetual motion engines and why they are. Easiest is the water turbine.

bob | (24.104.20.202) | Monday, 27 September 2004 10:22:36 PM
it suck

nathan alan holmes | (66.190.248.84) | Friday, 1 October 2004 3:07:13 PM
I have created the ultimate propetuial energy, it's real i'm not bluffing. People think that i am crazzy because i do not have the cradentials. They do not understand. It's made with a solar system but is not,I repeat(IS NOT)powered by the sun, but is powered by i'ts self. I am in the same boat as you are, and hope that you stay strong in what you beleave in. Thanks. Nathan Alan Holmes

nathan alan holmes | (66.190.248.84) | Friday, 1 October 2004 3:07:23 PM
I have created the ultimate propetuial energy, it's real i'm not bluffing. People think that i am crazzy because i do not have the cradentials. They do not understand. It's made with a solar system but is not,I repeat(IS NOT)powered by the sun, but is powered by i'ts self. I am in the same boat as you are, and hope that you stay strong in what you beleave in. Thanks. Nathan Alan Holmes

polo | (202.81.189.253) | Monday, 8 November 2004 8:36:52 PM
your ass is has a big hole

Leadgolem | (24.2.95.58) | Wednesday, 17 November 2004 10:21:36 PM
Although I don't believe perpetual motion is really possible, other then the universe, I am working on a device that converts energy from an extra dimensional source. I first saw the phenomenom I am trying to replicate accidentally. We had a ham radio in our electronics lab that just stopped working one morning. When we pulled it down to check it out the ac/dc converter continued to produce power while unplugged. It was a 12v converter and produced 10v while unplugged. This phenomenon continued for aproximately 20-30 minutes, until my instructor plugged it into a working socket. The socket it had been plugged into was on a circuit with an external light. The light had somehow filled with water during the night and blown the breaker. It is my belief the the combination of the radio at a specific frequency and the power surge allowed this device to become a bridge between our reality and this extradimensional plane. Unfortunately I didn't realize the significance of this at the time so I am missing several pieces of important data. It might be interesting to note that this radio was installed with a rather large external antenna at the time.

Leadgolem | (24.2.95.58) | Wednesday, 17 November 2004 10:24:42 PM
I am trying to get a hold of the exact specs on the the radio, ac/dc converter, and antenna. I will see if I can find out anything about the light also. I do remeber that it was a high power hallogen lamp. I believe it was a 300 watt.

mart (15) | (81.178.196.215) | Friday, 3 December 2004 5:52:39 AM
how can perpetual motion realy exist when the material it uses to work E.G the wood its made form, or metal will eventully over time wear down and break it's self. (the idea of perpetual motion is that it will run for ever no matter what)

BS-KY | (67.141.6.43) | Tuesday, 14 December 2004 5:12:38 AM
Perpetual motion is dependant on the construction, but the theory is interesting. One note above, the universe is not a perpetual motion machine. If the big bang is correct, there will be a point that expansion ends and contraction begins. The car the Nikola Tesla drove in Nigara Falls is an interesting story. Is there any info available, schematics, diagrams, general theory info, that anyone can point me to? Consider Tesla's genius, I have no doubt he had figured out how to tap the energy source of the universe proper, whether that be tachyon particles or the electric current that courses through the earth. The hunt should be seriuosly on. If you have legit info, I'd love to hear it. BSJUNKMAIL@alltel.net

jake | (152.163.100.8) | Wednesday, 15 December 2004 8:28:37 AM
Timothy you and I should hook up on e-mail and share ideas SpellCaster267@aol.com

Mark | (69.169.39.144) | Thursday, 13 January 2005 4:51:51 PM
I dont think there is prepetual motion, because as we know, light is slowing down. Our univers is coming to an end. it has been, ever since the fall of man several thousand years ago. Please tell me how a universe that is decaying can have prepetual motion.

Leadgolem | (67.177.31.11) | Friday, 14 January 2005 10:41:21 AM
Hipocrites, you pulled my SUBSTANSIVE post.

basith | (172.191.252.220) | Saturday, 29 January 2005 2:36:20 PM
quite resently, the dinamo mono cramial motor we all know and love was converted to a mono synct petrol motor i.e. the concept of electrical charged copper wires turning a magnet was translated to combustion fuel turing a crank shaft. which can be found in a certain Mazda mx-8. basicaly what i would like to suggest is, translating a basic 6 cylinder internal cobustion engine to a elctromanetic motor. the set up would be as folows. the piston heads which turn the cranck in the cylinder would be fitted with a strong magnet and at the top of that cylinder, were the spark plug is usually stuated, would be a correspondng magnet or copper wound wire, one with the same polar charge to create repelling. charge could be passed through the wire to create a bigger force hopefuly to turn the cranck. the motion hould be continuouse as there would be mutiple cylinders turning in sequenced rotation. the crank shaft may be then connected directly to a dynamo or axle drive to wheals. thats it from me, i hope you understand what im trying to put accross. do post if successfull

basith | (172.191.252.220) | Saturday, 29 January 2005 2:41:33 PM
do contact if interested, i hold a pattent. basith07@hotmail.com

basith | (172.191.252.220) | Saturday, 29 January 2005 2:58:03 PM
if not, try quantum particalsn namely fractionated charges in antiparticals, but to do that youed need a very expensive partical accelerator.

basith | (172.191.252.220) | Saturday, 29 January 2005 2:59:42 PM
joking bout the patent basith_07@yahoo.co.uk

james | (4.254.224.129) | Wednesday, 9 February 2005 5:09:17 PM
hello electrical energy from vacume is easy. If I can figure it out than anybody can. Think back to the two metal plate experiment. think vibration. think about how electrical flows are created and now you all have the answer. Still cant figure it out? want to buy my idea? sorry its not yet for sale.True free energy. Its coming soon.


To respond to the above item or the discussion below, use this form


Your Name:

Your Response:
(you may include HTML formatting or links, but keep them simple please!)


| [Return to the topic Index] | [Refresh this page (*)]